NEW SPECIES ON RWL!

[Firetooth]

Just wondering, because there is:
No ferrets (or wearets, but they are crossbreads)
No sea rats of river rats
No wolverines
No ermine
No polecats
No birds of any kind
No artic foxes
No Toads
No snakes

I could go on forever :-)

[Blood Wake]

you're an arctic fox

[Firetooth]

??? :?
I don't understand, my brain is like a sieve, sorry.

[Shadow]

I think the game is already complex enough. Adding another troop type is ok for random duels rounds, but I don;t think they should stay.

[Firetooth]

I don't mean a troop type, I mean a warlord type.

[Shadow]

Aha.  That could be interesting, but again, I think we need to iron out the holes in the races we have at the moment before we start adding new ones.

[Firetooth]

good point, I don't actually have a clue what the races do (shows how long I have been playing
RWL) I only picked marten and wildcat cause I like them :-)

[wolf bite]

A "race".

Remembers the marsupial round we had. hehe.


Wolf Bite

[Firetooth]

No, I don't, I'm really only,... mmm about 1month on this game, maruspial? isnt that like a kangaroo?I'm probarbly wrong.


[Merged a double post. Don't forget about that little edit button... ~Shael]

[The Lady Shael]

We used to have a bunch more races several months ago, before we started revamping the game. Ferret, weasel, ermine, crow...we took them out because it made things complex, and those races were kind of unnecessary considering the main strategies that people use.

Though I was very sad we had to cut Weasel, because my character Shael Varonne is a weasel. =( Not a stoat.

[Shogun]

Kinda hard for me to be "Ferret Warlords" when there are in fact no ferrets   :cry:

[Firetooth]

Intresting... 8-)

[Alazar is Back]

I think that it will most likely just make the game more complex and a little more confusing! But that is just my opinion and it is entirely up to the admins! :wink:

[Firetooth]

yeah same, I'm just a noob though so I never knew there were different species :oops:

Oh well, at least next time my poll should be more...meaningful