The RWL opinions for president!!!

[DemonSlavers]

 

...Demon...It's people like you that make arguing against liberals not fun...They expect all of us to do it like you.

ha yeh right i had the right statement you tell me what you would have said. and its not soppose to be fun.

and LOL ya wolf bite he prob. married her just because she was rich.

[RazorClaw]

 No way, Demon! I thought it was because of her good looks and personality... *coughcough*

[DemonSlavers]

No way, Demon! I thought it was because of her good looks and personality... *coughcough*

LOL

[Tarnak Vishu]

 Kerry 100%! I've never liked Bush, especially since he invaded Iraq. He had NO proof and he still devoutedly said Iraq had WOMD even like, 7 months after they invaded. Tell me, if Saddam had WOMD, uh, perhaps he would have used them in the war. North Korea is a bigger threat than Iraq.

Bush:  ::disagrees::
Kerry  ::agrees::  ::agrees::  ::agrees::  ::agrees::  ::agrees::  

[Peace Alliance]

 it really gets on my nerves, when people say they support bush just because kerry is somewhat inconsistent. if your going to look at the bad in kerry, why are you overlooking the fact that bush went to war with a country that was no threat to his country, while lying to the entire country and telling them the country WAS a threat. he went in without the support of the and world allies, and when he went in, he murdered tens of thousands of innocent woman and children, who had NO threat to the USA. who gives a (junk) if kerry's plan is too confusing for you, Bush MURDERED people!

with that said, who would i want to be the president? i'd have to say nader. his party has by far the right point of view on things. i really wish they were more popular because a political system should have more then just 2 feesable contestants.

If i could vote, i would be viting for kerry though. because i'd rather have kerry then bush.

[Nohcnonk]

 The world is d00mded.  Bush is ahead.

Kerry's goooood....

[cloud]

 I don't care if there wasn't really a need to go to war with iraq, their country just sucked in general and something needed to be done with it. I say we shoulda just nuked it, put in a giant parking lot, and took the oil...

Oh and i just felt that i needed to point out that Nader doesnt have
an official  party, so peace's statement is flawed, even though i support
Nader.

[wolf bite]

 Peace,

I can see you have been watching democratic run news channels. Have you not noticed how many of them only say one side of facts and when those facts are proven wrong, they don?t retract them? Suppose not, because one would have to some how know the true facts to know the ones broadcasted were incorrect.

You statements above are incorrect.


Wolf Bite

[cloud]

 oooh, burn.

[RazorClaw]

it really gets on my nerves, when people say they support bush just because kerry is somewhat inconsistent. if your going to look at the bad in kerry, why are you overlooking the fact that bush went to war with a country that was no threat to his country, while lying to the entire country and telling them the country WAS a threat. he went in without the support of the and world allies, and when he went in, he murdered tens of thousands of innocent woman and children, who had NO threat to the USA. who gives a (junk) if kerry's plan is too confusing for you, Bush MURDERED people!

with that said, who would i want to be the president? i'd have to say nader. his party has by far the right point of view on things. i really wish they were more popular because a political system should have more then just 2 feesable contestants.

If i could vote, i would be viting for kerry though. because i'd rather have kerry then bush.

BULL! Bush never murdered ten of thousands of innocent women and children. Crappy Canadian media feeds you people this stuff because US and Briatain punished you for not helping out in the War on Terror. And Suddam Hussein paid families of suicide bombers $25,000 dollars cash compensation for their sons, brothers, or fathers being killed attacking "infidels", ntm Hussein murdered MILLIONS of people.

[Peace Alliance]

 RazorClaw, did i at any point say that hussien was a GOOD man? where did you get that from? I know he's a terrible person. Iraq needed a reformation. But so does north korea. so does iran...  and what makes the US our world police? If the US wanted to go in and stabalise iraq, and help its people, why not do it diplomaticly, or through peace keeping. and if military action is the only way, why not at LEAST wait for the support of the UN. I believe the UN is one of the most important organisations in the world, and bush totally disregarded it, and made its purpose useless.

I can see you have been watching democratic run news channels. Have you not noticed how many of them only say one side of facts and when those facts are proven wrong, they don?t retract them? Suppose not, because one would have to some how know the true facts to know the ones broadcasted were incorrect.

I watch the CBC. you may not know of the canadian broadcasting corperation, but it isn't democraticly ran, it shows both side, and i have seen both sides. what i said was the truth. bush put bombs down in iraq, and killed tens of thousands of people, and a lot of them, were woman and children. i call that murder. Bush told all of the united states, that FOR A FACT, iraq had weopons of mass destruction. he didn't say "our evidence suggests" that there is weopons... he didn't say "there is a possibility" he said that FOR A FACT, there are weopons of mass disctruction in iraq... but were there any? was iraq REALLY the threat it was made out to be?

sure, there may have been a threat in iraq, but was it one that required immediat, irrashional military action? or one that could be solved over time, with a diplomatic approach.

also, i have no doupt that bush has tryed to put the focus on the war so that people didn't notice the fact that he wasn't doing anything to help his own country. ask yourself, is america a better place now then it was 4 years ago?

like retto said, bush is unpredictable. ruled by corperations. i have no doupt in my mind that he is a murderous crook. you may think those are strong words, but their the truth. i'm proud to be a canadian. my country took no part in the war. my country DOES want to help other nations in need, so we send peace keepers, we work diplomatically, and we work with the UN. thats why canada is a great country.

[Holby]

 Anyone seen that movie from the 60s about those guys running for President? B&W, starred Henry Fonda. Very good.

[Kilkenne]

 I would like to note that there would BE NO UN without the United States providing 63% of it's funding. We deserve 63% of the vote in any vote. That way, only Bahrain and Luxembourg need to agree with us to get to 66%. Heh...

UN? Nope. USA.

[Aqualis]

 Saddam killing millions of his own people was reason enough for us to go in there and kick him out.

We waited 14 months in the UN before we realized that they weren't going to do anything. We have no obligation to do what they say. I see no reason for the UN, they just seem to want to rip apart our constitution.

Bush told all of the united states, that FOR A FACT, iraq had weopons of mass destruction. he didn't say "our evidence suggests" that there is weopons... he didn't say "there is a possibility" he said that FOR A FACT, there are weopons of mass disctruction in iraq... but were there any?

Have you ever thought of the possibility that the weapons were moved out of Iraq after we gave them such a huge warning that we were invading?

or one that could be solved over time, with a diplomatic approach.

We tried that. It didn't work.

like retto said, bush is unpredictable. ruled by corperations

Where do you get that. Especially when Kerry was married to the heiress of the Heinz corporation.

[Peace Alliance]

 

Posted on Nov 3 2004, 08:55 AM I would like to note that there would BE NO UN without the United States providing 63% of it's funding. We deserve 63% of the vote in any vote. That way, only Bahrain and Luxembourg need to agree with us to get to 66%. Heh...

UN? Nope. USA.

kilk, thats exactly what i'm talking about. The UN is important because its where all the worlds great nations come together to come to logical conclusions that everyone agrees with. it ensures the safety of those in the UN, and unity around the world. regardless of funding. when the US makes decisions on its own, its making decisions without the support of all its UN allies... the US does not rule the world. no matter how much you'd like it to.

Have you ever thought of the possibility that the weapons were moved out of Iraq after we gave them such a huge warning that we were invading?

and yet bush still stands in front of cameras on national TV and states that the attacks on iraq were a success. but he can't find the mystical weopons?
also, with the amount of survailence that was being put on iraq... it would have been QUITE difficult to move weopons of mass desctuction out of the country...

We tried that. It didn't work.

in what way did it not work? was the united stats under some sort of time constraint here? was there some reason bush had to go in so hastly? i don't think so. not if all those weopens were being "moved out"... or most likely just not exhisting.

Where do you get that. Especially when Kerry was married to the heiress of the Heinz corporation.

i never said kerry had no connections with corperations. i said i bush is ruled by them... and i don't believe kerry is. i know the 911 movie was completely one sided, but the conference where all the business's got together and talked about how much money they were going to make out of iraq was just proof, that it was a profitable war for the corperations, and i don't doupt bush knew it was going to be.

Saddam killing millions of his own people was reason enough for us to go in there and kick him out.

#1. the united states aren't the world police.
#2. they didn't have the consent of the UN, which in my opinion is VERY important
#3. there are other, more brutal dictators, making even more threats to america, whom bush seems to ignore.