Good the new Loren?

[Juby (Tercios)]

<_< Wow, this Stan guys a jerk.

heh, I wouldn't talk trogdor, you though Loren was Good  :lol:  

[Larrusus Deathspear]

 Je ne comprehende pas. Waht do you mean "you thought Loren was good", do you mean good as in the clan or good as in skilled at the game. and Stan is a Jerk, at least Loren didn't act so conceited.

[Nohcnonk]

 *points at title* NO

[IFman]

 nohc's right *pionts at Good's forums

[Stan(NM)]

 I'm a jerk becuase I pointed out you making a mistake?
How do children learn?
How do you learn?
Think before you open your mouth?

[Veranor]

Allow me to clarify for you.
A) I created Good.
B) I have never had/intend to have any affiliation with the clan known as "Loren"
C) Loren tried to unite emperors.
D) I have created emperors. Every member of clan Good or Best is an emperor, a god among RWL men.
E) Please dont talk about things you know nothing of, slandering my clan with such pittances.

It's libel, not slander. I fail to see how speculations about you being an old clan with a new name "damages your reputation"

[Stan(NM)]

 Your insight fails on more than one aspect.
I didn't say it damages our reputation.
I said it's slander, if you can't understand my context, that's too bad.
False truths, false accusations, not real.
Again, our clan has nothing to do with Loren as you would subtly introduce.

[sh0e]

Allow me to clarify for you.
A) I created Good.
B) I have never had/intend to have any affiliation with the clan known as "Loren"
C) Loren tried to unite emperors.
D) I have created emperors. Every member of clan Good or Best is an emperor, a god among RWL men.
E) Please dont talk about things you know nothing of, slandering my clan with such pittances.

It's libel, not slander. I fail to see how speculations about you being an old clan with a new name "damages your reputation"

according to the way you have put it.. neither does libel fit

[Billy]

 Heya Stan!  Billy says hi!  Good be better than Loren because Good kills many enemies!  Stan is Billy's friend.

[Veranor]

Allow me to clarify for you.
A) I created Good.
B) I have never had/intend to have any affiliation with the clan known as "Loren"
C) Loren tried to unite emperors.
D) I have created emperors. Every member of clan Good or Best is an emperor, a god among RWL men.
E) Please dont talk about things you know nothing of, slandering my clan with such pittances.

It's libel, not slander. I fail to see how speculations about you being an old clan with a new name "damages your reputation"

according to the way you have put it.. neither does libel fit

I know, it is neither... depending on your opinon. However, it is most definately not slander. Also, there's no context to infer... you can't change the context of reality. To slander someone's name is to: "to utter or spread slander." Utter implies speech.

[Stan(NM)]

 http://www.m-w.com (Edited the link, I used an H instead of a W)

Spreading false truths, i.e. slander.

[sh0e]

depending on your opinon.

it is not dependent on opinion
you might want to relook the definition of libel

according to the logic that you posted on why slander does not fit.. libel does not fit

[Stan(NM)]

 sh0e = genius
(never mess with a genius)
I think he's fixed more code errors in the past 1 week than the admins have in the past 2 years.

[wolf bite]

 Urrg .....


I don?t care what Webster says in a few lines, if you are talking about using a form of defamation as a cause of legal action, than you use it based on the legal terminology.

Defamation can be split into 2 basic forms:

Slander is spoken defamation, Libel is written defamation.

There are other types like per quad, but this does not have to be a lecture  on a subject that many books have been written.

Whether that statement excided to any form of defamation is debatable.

Trust me that this is right.

You guys want to get back on topic now?


Wolf Bite esq.

[Stan(NM)]

 I need to get me one of those.