No Leaders round

[Peace Alliance]

 why? i think its fine right now. any more servers and people will get annoyed... i know i will.

And turbo is slow enough as it is. I don't see how slowing it would make a more interesting, or even an unique game at all.

[Garagas Ledavas]

 Turbo is meant to be fast, don't slow it down.

[sh0e]

 fast? 1/2 a turn per minute is hardly fast
thats only 360 turns per 12 hours.. you check in maybe twice a day

and you wouldnt even max turns if you havent checked in for 24 hours
450 turns == 900 minutes (15 hours)
150 stored turns == 1500 minutes (25 hours)
it takes 40 hours to max turns.. thats more than a day and a half

[Garagas Ledavas]

 It's fast enough for me.

[Juby (Tercios)]

fast? 1/2 a turn per minute is hardly fast
thats only 360 turns per 12 hours.. you check in maybe twice a day

and you wouldnt even max turns if you havent checked in for 24 hours
450 turns == 900 minutes (15 hours)
150 stored turns == 1500 minutes (25 hours)
it takes 40 hours to max turns.. thats more than a day and a half

I don't think your math is right, 450 turns = 900 minute, but the extra 150 only takes 300 minutes, therefore you max out at 20 hours if I'm not mistakes.

[sh0e]

 stored turns is 1 every 10 minutes

nvm i was wrong
stored turns just takes the overflow of normal turns.. i was mislead by the game guide and hints wording

[Stan(NM)]

 Off topic.

A no leaders round would be great. We need some admin input on this one.
A no troops round after the no leader round would be great too, that wya we cna have a round to see whos'best with troops then tos ee who's best with leaders
(troops would still be in the game, but attacking with them would be taken out so they could be used as NW trophies)
(we could call them a special monetary system, like rats are copper, weasels silver, staots gold, skiffs platinum, etc..)

[sh0e]

Off topic.

A no leaders round would be great. We need some admin input on this one.
A no troops round after the no leader round would be great too, that wya we cna have a round to see whos'best with troops then tos ee who's best with leaders
(troops would still be in the game, but attacking with them would be taken out so they could be used as NW trophies)
(we could call them a special monetary system, like rats are copper, weasels silver, staots gold, skiffs platinum, etc..)

ya we could reclassify military units as sex slaves
then add a new loot-alike spell called "pimp" that would be dependent on units

[Stan(NM)]

 ROFL LOLLERZZZ
OMG wat HAX)RZZZZZ! ROFL OLOL

[Nohcnonk]

 Talk about being off topic... :lol:

That /is/ funny though.  The skiffs could be Bentlys or something, and the stoats would be *insert song by 50 Cent here*(I don't think that you can say that...).  Weasles would be hitmen, and rats would be thugs.  That works. XDD

[sh0e]

Talk about being off topic... :lol:

That /is/ funny though.  The skiffs could be Bentlys or something, and the stoats would be *insert song by 50 Cent here*(I don't think that you can say that...).  Weasles would be hitmen, and rats would be thugs.  That works. XDD

it is a joke related to one of the ideas in relation to no leaders round
that is partly serious and could be considered as a partial idea
and hardly is "off topic"

[Peace Alliance]

 Instead of a no military round, i think we should do a just huts and guard towers round.

Most leader stratagys... in fact i think all of them, depend on having troops, only with most of them, you get the troops with leaders.

So making it so that all you can do is make leaders and guard towers would be just like limiting the game to only leader stratagys.

I don't know of many leader strats that require any of the buildings for resources like money and food... but we could leave markets tents, foragers and citys in if we need to.

[sh0e]

 is there anyone in the top scoreboards that uses anything other than that?
wouldnt it be pretty much the same as it is now?

[Peace Alliance]

 It would be proof once and for all that the game is lob sided.

[Stan(NM)]

 Amen.