Satan Helper is Banned

Abby The Rat · October 13, 2003, 04:08:37 AM

Creating another account because he couldn't wait to tell us that he hasn't done anything wrong to break the forum rules has moved us to ban him from this forum.

1. He flamed others, (calling others cry babies, etcs)
2. He used lang of questionable sorts
3. Questioning our disicion to gag him
4. He dodge his week gag

I hope he enjoys his trip to Plato. I hear it quite cold this time of the year.

Holby · October 13, 2003, 06:29:55 AM

I can understand why he was banned, yet I don't feel he should be.
Satan's Helper was just toying with our forums, you could say. He didn't take himself, nor us, seriously. I believe he was just trying to have some fun, despite his breaking rules.
However, I understand his language was slightly questionable, but I've checked out the SG forums, and they are /extremely/ lenient and slack in regards to language, spelling and grammar, etc. All of those things the RWL Forums support strongly, and we have to teach that.
In his own mind, I don't think he believed he was being terribly bad, and I personally don't believe he was either. Actually, I had a good laugh a couple of times.
I am fairly sure every single one of you will disagree with me, because Satan's posts have made something of a mess on the boards.
But I ask you re-think your decision Ad, and consider a gagging, rather than such a strong blow.

TR Shadow · October 13, 2003, 06:53:47 AM

I totally agree with Holby. Satan's Helper wasn't doing anything that terribly bad. A gagging would do, even after he questioned his gag. I mean, if I was gagged and I didn't know what I did, would I question it? You bet I would. Did you at least give him a warning before you gagged him? Did anyone tell him it was wrong?

*Giggles* I know I find humor in the strangest things, but I found his posts halarious.

~A Pointless Post From Julie

Veranor · October 13, 2003, 07:07:37 AM

Yeah, but unless you IP ban him, he'll just go around any gag... like he already did.

calria · October 13, 2003, 08:05:55 AM

1) He was gagged. He went around it and flamed again.
2) He was highly offensive.
3) Julie, EVERYONE was telling him to watch it. He just flamed them for telling him that. He had no remorse.

Dead Eye · October 13, 2003, 08:26:38 AM

I think that this decision was very good one for once. He definatly realized that this would come.

Dixie Ros? · October 13, 2003, 09:28:25 AM

::Claps::

The Beatles · October 13, 2003, 10:39:08 AM

I'd agree with Holby, but for one small detail: his name.

Dead Eye · October 13, 2003, 10:56:48 AM

Yea, his name is horrible. We aren't allowed to say lovely( the dar word) but his name has to do with the devil, and down under(another word not allowed) I mean, that is really disrespectful, because if some one here is very religous that could be harmful to them.

Mark · October 13, 2003, 01:37:28 PM

Alot of these people that are gagged I have never heard of before. Although if what Ad said is true then he should[i/] be gagged.

The Lady Shael · October 13, 2003, 02:54:54 PM

Since Cal says he was already gagged, I agree with Ad's decision. He's been warned too many times to deserve a second chance, and others were getting rather irked.

Dixie Ros? · October 13, 2003, 04:26:28 PM

I agree.

Peace Alliance · October 13, 2003, 05:11:53 PM

*cheers* Hurray for the ban! I am 100% with you there Ad, he knew lovely well he was getting close to being banned. Then he pushed it even further. I know its not going to matter much to him, but i hope he learns a lesson from this.

calria · October 13, 2003, 11:13:33 PM

People like that almost never learn their lesson.
They just go through life without a clue, but it's more to their detriment than anyone else's.

bjornredtail · October 14, 2003, 12:20:17 AM

Ad the rat: Am I correct in saying it is aginst rules to challange the Admin's actions? That is what #3 on the list of offences seemes to say.