Liberation Achieved?

[Neobaron]

WB, that I am aware of, there are not and have never any spies in Squire.

I had a lead on "Raise Your Weapon" but nothing came of it.

[Sevah]

Raise your weapons hasn't been online much at all in the last 5months. I keep tabs on enemies.

The word of the day is Despair.

[Shadow]

Always so dramatic, Sevah ^_^

Today has been... odd.

In any case, I would be all for making the Squire clan forum public. There are lots of newbie strategy threads in there that people could take a look at, and it could set all the silly speculation rest, as well as the need for spies.

[Holby]

Squire has never been any kind of powerful force, we are a teaching clan. We just happened to have 2 billion net because of kill attempts and the war. I understand everyone coming together to destroy it, but they better have done it for a reason. If there's no attempted lock or show of force now, destroying achieves nothing. I mean, it is always fun to ruin someone else, but realistically, it's a waste of turns unless something is done to assert power.

The esp Firetooth points out came at a time when I had to run because I was being suicided, so I sent all of the Net to wolf bite. He didn't have a great ratio either, and was going away. Once I'd finished my run, he gave it back. There was no attempted lock. I have been part of every successful lock in reg the last however many years. To claim this was an attempted one is nonsense.

I don't believe it was a kill run on Wolf Bite, and though I logged in on 400 land, I don't really feel they meant to kill me, either. I have no doubt they could. When you have the game's biggest 3 clans working to take down a single player, anything other than complete domination would be highly embarrassing. They could have killed us if they chose.

I'm interested to see what this group of "liberationists" intend to do now, because I have little hope they can do anything. I'm begging for an attempt at a lock. I would love to be on the other side for a change.

[Gen. Volkov]

There is no statistic reason to take down to 1,400 land. Sure some were standard to take armies, some were sack to take food. But most were straight attacks to take land. The only value to straight attack for 20 land per attack is a kill run.

Kilk worries about lessening the the intent of the attacks. Ah too late. A clear failed kill run. Come on!

Wolf bite, if they had meant to kill you, do you really think I would have participated? We stopped someone in Knight from killing Holby. The point of this exercise was a takedown, not kills. Why else would we have suicided Holby so many times, when we could have spent a lot less turns killing him? We killed 2 billion net +, and did it without killing anyone. That, by any standard, is skill, not incompetence. OK, you were knocked to low land, perhaps by some over-enthusiastic members of Knight, but we didn't kill you, because we didn't want too. If you can't take this like a man, perhaps you are no longer the player I thought you were. I've lost a great deal of respect for you in this thread.

Shadow, Holbs, I look forward to your responses in game.

[Ruddertail]

Wolf, the difference between 10k and 1k is 1.5 mil leaders.  Plus the turns it takes you to get (and build) back to 10k. If you really want to cripple a leaderer, and you aren't short on turns yourself, it's the logical thing to do.  

Tbh, I don't know if orders were given for you to be on 1.5k, or if some newb got overzealous, but either way, that just proves our point. Orders went out that you were to be taken no lower, when the capacity existed for you be be dead.  We could have have killed you. I spent a whole run sacking Holby. Other people sacked Holby. People spent all kinds of turns doing all kinds of things - if we wanted dead people, we could have had dead people. We didn't, because that's not the way we wanted to play. Kills aren't really the style on reg, and cheap or not, nobody can deny that you've a better opportunity to fight back now than if we'd just spent the turns to kill you.

Really, it's a game. Either get your in-game revenge, or smile, say, "nice job," and move on.

[Briar]

Knight - which everyone knows should really be called Briar's noob brigade

Tee hee <3 you Rudderbutt. The clan is a good group though, noobs or no noobs.


@WB

IT WASN'T A KILL RUN. Goodness. What's this? Something different? A different tactic that isn't in you little Redwall: Warlord Blackbook? Like what has been said, and apparently isn't getting through to you, it would have been too easy to kill you, but a major waste in general. The joy of having your leaders destroyed gives me far more pleasure than your death would cause.  We're not going to kill you. Period. Especially with you asking for your own death, how dull.

Knight, in our forums, stated that we were taking you down to low land, no kill. Ask anyone in the clan, there was specific non-kill orders. The only reason Holbs was taken down so low is because you were at the limit we had set out, so we moved on and Anarchy got a little land happy.

Accept that you have been surprised and possibly even bested at the moment and move on.

[Sevah]

I'm not clanned. I'd find it liberating if i can collect the kill on Wolf Bite. HAHAHA Sevz the legend killer

[cloud]

I'm not clanned. I'd find it liberating if i can collect the kill on Wolf Bite. HAHAHA Sevz the legend killer

Thankfully the 24 hours are up so I won't have to retaliate. Happy killing.

[Sevah]

No need to get in the way Cloud, this one's between WB n myself. He knows he deserves it whether he admits doin wrong or not. Once he revives he's welcome as my first alliance