Leader Strat

Uiblis · February 23, 2011, 02:57:51 PM

A question about leaders...
If I had 10k land, 10k huts and had a 100 ratio, would that be better than having...5714 huts and a 175 ratio?

Shadow · February 23, 2011, 02:59:37 PM

Assuming you mean leader/land ratio:

The second setup is better. Missions are cheaper, and your defense ratio is better.

if you are talking about leader/hut ratio:

the first one is better. Mission output is higher, defense and attack are unchanged.

Uiblis · February 23, 2011, 03:59:30 PM

Thanks.

Twilight Shadow · February 23, 2011, 04:43:02 PM

If you need other tips please ask.

Holby · February 24, 2011, 06:12:33 AM

Quote from: Twilight Shadow on February 23, 2011, 04:43:02 PM
If you need other tips please ask.

Um, why are you saying this, when Shadow was the one who answered the question?

Twilight Shadow · February 24, 2011, 09:56:57 AM

I was going to but shadow beat me to the punch. So its basically a shout ;)

Juska · February 24, 2011, 03:24:01 PM

If you have a million leaders your output is going to be the same if you have a 100 leader/hut ratio or a 175 leader/hut ratio....

The second setup is better on all accounts.

You get the same output. You use less loyalty per spell cast. Your net is a lower (which can be a bonus if your close to the next net tier).

Spells rely on leaders and their output has nothing do with the actual hut amount.

Shadow · February 24, 2011, 03:29:02 PM

QuoteIf you have a million leaders your output is going to be the same if you have a 100 leader/hut ratio or a 175 leader/hut ratio....

No. Only if you drop the excess land in the second case will your output be the same. If you have land that is not huts, your output takes a hit.

Juska · February 24, 2011, 04:58:08 PM

Hmm, ok I was considering having total of 5700 odd land, not running that many huts and having 10k total.

Spell output is dependent on hut/land ratio?

I know loyalty costs increase generally with land.

Shadow · February 24, 2011, 05:44:01 PM

QuoteSpell output is dependent on hut/land ratio?

Yes

Juska · February 24, 2011, 08:58:43 PM

I'll have to take a gander at the code sometime.

Holby · February 25, 2011, 06:22:16 PM

Quote from: Twilight Shadow on February 24, 2011, 09:56:57 AM
I was going to but shadow beat me to the punch. So its basically a shout ;)

Basically posting for the sake of posting.

Juska · February 26, 2011, 06:16:35 PM

$cash = round($this->self->e_trpwiz * ($this->self->e_health / 100) * 65 * (1 + sqrt($this->self->e_bldwiz / $this->self->e_land) / 2) * $this->self->race->magic / ($this->self->calcSizeBonus() * $this->self->calcSizeBonus()));

Yeah, hut/land ratio matters. Good to know.

Shadow · February 26, 2011, 06:26:31 PM

where is that from? Definitely not our code ^_^ But the logic is the same, yes.

Sevah · February 27, 2011, 07:32:49 AM

Quote from: Shadow on February 24, 2011, 03:29:02 PM
QuoteJuska: If you have a million leaders your output is going to be the same if you have a 100 leader/hut ratio or a 175 leader/hut ratio....

Shadow: No. Only if you drop the excess land in the second case will your output be the same. If you have land that is not huts, your output takes a hit.

BOTH INCORRECT.

If you have 100ratio land/huts your output is at it's peak. Losing some land gives a slight penalty, you will loot for less on 175 but it's cheaper on loyalty and far greater in the long run.