Redwall: Warlords

Night Wolf · June 04, 2009, 02:31:09 PM

I still like blood wakes Idea, I already told him I was gonna wreck him every time he came back, just figured I could use my time in better ways. But now I just dont care.

Briar · June 04, 2009, 02:36:55 PM

As stated on several different threads, killing takes no skill, as seen last round. Keeping in the low rankings so he is unable to do any harm would be better

windhound · June 04, 2009, 02:37:21 PM

Er. How do you wreck that which has nothing?
All he has to do is find a troop hole, which just about everyone has, and keep attacking.
You dont really set him back by killing him

Best fix is to make the game's code reflect its code of conduct. IE, make kills harder.
Having the game check for cities is trivial

Shadow · June 04, 2009, 02:41:54 PM

K then go for it :) I just wanted to make sure you did that, since it wasn't implemented last time.

Zeppelin · June 04, 2009, 02:43:02 PM

*shrug* wouldnt changing the game conditions in the middle of the round be as good as cheating? besides kill piss people off but theyre not code abuse or exploits.

Neobaron · June 04, 2009, 02:44:16 PM

This thread needs more me.

btw, jeebus is willing to be your new holder. Im good for it. <3

Shadow · June 04, 2009, 02:51:09 PM

Making it harder for people to ruin the game out of spite is not cheating, it's progress. Using existing code to make yourself invincible is cheating. There is a subtle difference, but I am sure you can find it if you think about it...

Zeppelin · June 04, 2009, 02:58:14 PM

Quote from: Shadow on June 04, 2009, 02:51:09 PM
Making it harder for people to ruin the game out of spite is not cheating, it's progress. Using existing code to make yourself invincible is cheating. There is a subtle difference, but I am sure you can find it if you think about it...

i dont see much difference if youre referring to vacation before. the point of vacation is to protect your turns, troops, resources, and land 12 hours after you set vacation. and kills set the player back a bit but otherwise its still a part of almost any promi. as for kills just defend yourself better and any would-be killers flop.

Shadow · June 04, 2009, 03:04:55 PM

No, the point of vacation is to protect your troops and such 12 hours after you set it WHILE YOU ARE ON VACATION. Real life vacation. :P

Moving on now - that code has been in the works for a long time and never got permenently implemented, now is as good a time as any to put it in.

Briar · June 04, 2009, 03:08:49 PM

I kinda agree with Zep....we shouldn't implement it this round, OR if we did we need to do it by this weekend

Zeppelin · June 04, 2009, 03:11:14 PM

Quote from: Shadow on June 04, 2009, 03:04:55 PM
No, the point of vacation is to protect your troops and such 12 hours after you set it WHILE YOU ARE ON VACATION. Real life vacation. :P

Moving on now - that code has been in the works for a long time and never got permenently implemented, now is as good a time as any to put it in.

put it in next round then because killsare perfectly legit as they are. a city and a holder makes them very hard to kill but its their own fault for leaving a stupid hole. this is what everyone talks about when they say players here have no skill. changing the game a lot midround is cheating. kills arent exploits so removing kills after theyve been done 3 times now is an exploit.

Shadow · June 04, 2009, 03:17:27 PM

See, this is where I really like that whole arbitrary ban system they have over at pheonix :P Someone trying to ruin the game? Banned... Course that leads to all kinds of other issues, but the system does have its merits.

Fine, next round then, I doubt it would have been done this one anyway.

Blobfish · June 04, 2009, 03:38:18 PM

Zeppelin, your a glory-deprived idiot. Yes, I also have 1337 insults.
Go back to QMT if it's so good there, instead of telling us ways this site could be imrpoved. This site is based off QMT-but get this, it's not QMT.
Change your playing style or go back to QMT. This is not an agressive site.

Briar, he's a either stupid or doesn't undertsand what you're trying to say, or both. I wouldn't bother. Zep, yes it's a war game, great work, that logic is indeed flawless. But the goal of this war game is to break the emperor, get all that lovely land and overtake him. All those stoats meant we were getting closer. 1.5bil net destroyed.
We were not trying to emp. This kill was unprovoked. What's worse, your so dumb you think this actually benefits you, don't you?
People like you make emp rounds impossible. More focused on killing randomly then achieving the actual goal.

War is fun, but not against turds like you. You couldn't outnet us, were jealous we would break so you killed us for no reason besides that.

Blood Wake · June 04, 2009, 03:53:39 PM

*claps for Freddy*

Zeppelin · June 04, 2009, 04:03:27 PM

yawn

if im correct youre firetooth so get this. "go back to valhall" and now "Go back to QMT" are what kills the game or what gets your rear end whooped. from what ive collected here kills are not only acceptable btu the best way to get away with kills is by killing more. oh hey fine with me after all its all unprovoked. i really dotn care what type of round this one is because my plan doesnt have to change. so if yorue really so pissed with me coming here and ruining the game why dont you follow upo n other theats and ruin me? well other than the point that its pointless to kill someone so weak who just doesnt care about dying. now then ill keep doing what i want to do until someone figures a way to stop me.

Wow