Ereptor

[Dead Eye]

 I think that the people who said he had to go, need a reason. Most of us gave ours, but some just say "I don't like him" that isn't a good reason.

[Ruatine]

 My vote: NO!! Though this may sound like a repeat of what others have said, I will say it anyway because it is the reasoning behind my vote:

Ereptor made it to where he is, and he should stay. Just because he knows how to play the game better than most people, doesn't mean that he should now step down as emperor because people don't like it. In my opinion Ereptor is a brilliant commander. He made it to the top, but he didn't just make it there and sustain his networth. He kept increasing it. Then, he won the support of several warlords in the top ten, thereby allowing him to secure his position as emperor.

Long live Emperor Ereptor!

[Dead Eye]

 Thank you, it seems the only people who gave good reasons are those saying he should stay. People like Rough Raiders just don't like him, so he has to go. I didn't like Tarsion(spelt wrong) but it doesn't mean I tried to vote him off. The only one who seems to have stated their reasons clearly against Ereptor is Aus.  

[General Austin]

 *beams with pride* :lol:  Actually, Rough Raiders agreed with everything I said, so my post might have been considered his reasons also. Just a thought....

[Dead Eye]

 Oh, one thing I forgot to mention in my last post. If we MAKE Ereptor step down, it shows that he was the greatest ever Warlord, and that we couldn't kill him, or take him from rank 1. TO MAKE HIM STEP DOWN SHOWS THAT HE WAS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. But if we say he should stay, and some one starts to gain streangth and take up the lost cause, and defeats Ereptor, it shall show that he wasn't invinsable. Kilk showed he wasn't. So if we make him step down, he wins. He wins this war. Because it proves that none of us, and I mean NONE OF US, could take him down to even rank 2. For those of you who are against Ereptor, make sure you read this before you vote. Because if you say he should step down because you hate him, it shows that you just hate him because he could never be stopped.  

[Beem]

 And, if he did step down.  How many people would attack him and kill him just when he starts up again to prevent him from raising to the top again?  I bet it would get extreemly iritating trying to start over again with a bunch of protesters at your throat killing every move you make.

[Power of Mordor]

 Personally, I believe Ereptor should do as he chooses. I understand many people's point of view, to say that by being so poweful he ruins the game for others, but I have to disagree. A reset will come eventually, and when it does everyone will have a fair shot. Kilk in response to your, "I proved it was possible to break him but didnt want to, I disagree. You were the only one in enough power to help those who said he was to powerful, and it would have been a much better example had you won. Instead you were defeated and the point that came across to most was, "Kilk broke Ereptor twice gaining about 100k acres, and following that Ereptor took all of Kilks 300k acres, destroyed him, and became even more powerful." Thats how I see it anyways, Ereptor is probably out of reach now, and many will probably stop playing because of it, They have many valid reasons: 1. No one can be Emperor. 2. Clans can not exist because Ereptor can choose anyone to destroy. 3. Even if Ereptor cant attack you he can send aid to those who will. 4. If you become his enemy you die. Ereptor has destroyed clans for one, but yet again that remains his decescion. For example PAL, they previously contained about 7 members above 40 million networth, and now they are trying desperatly to rebuild after masses of attacks by the Emperor.

[General Austin]

 Hmph. He could have destroyed his clan, you know. He COULD have beaten Ereptor into a bloody pulp. Just he didn't want it to end so fast. Now, he's invincible, so I don't think this poll makes any difference.