Java scritpt

Sharptooh · February 28, 2012, 03:02:30 PM

Tell me about it :/

Saying that IE9 was a vast improvement, and IE10 looks like it'll be half decent, I just wish they'd advocate support for open video codecs

Kyrolin Zenyar · February 28, 2012, 03:03:34 PM

IE10=half decent<Chrome v1=Perfect.

And I might mention Chrome is in v11 now...

Colonel Yuri · February 28, 2012, 03:56:53 PM

thanks guys

Sharptooh · February 28, 2012, 04:13:18 PM

No problem Yuri :) sorry we're spamming your thread with things you probably don't understand!

Quote from: Kyrolin Zenyar on February 28, 2012, 02:57:55 PM
HTML4 would be a good base.

Indeed, although it's cool to dabble with HTML5, I'd just never use it in a website that wasn't tailored to geeks or mobile phones . . .

Kyrolin Zenyar · February 28, 2012, 04:14:08 PM

True, true...
So you're saying you'd use it for RWL? :P

Colonel Yuri · February 28, 2012, 04:23:06 PM

Quote from: Sharptooh on February 28, 2012, 04:13:18 PM
No problem Yuri :) sorry we're spamming your thread with things you probably don't understand!

Its alrite

Sharptooh · February 28, 2012, 04:23:58 PM

Quote from: Kyrolin Zenyar on February 28, 2012, 04:14:08 PM
So you're saying you'd use it for RWL? :P

Possibly, it depends what you're looking to do.

And I can't remember off the top of my head the stats for RWL browser usage, still think IE is pretty high :/

Kyrolin Zenyar · February 28, 2012, 04:24:50 PM

Hm. I meant that you'd use HTML5 for RWL.

We are a collection of geeks after all.