massive losses

[Shadow]

Benkei sent me this:

Your Army breaks through Jarlaxle II's defenses and captures 604 Acres of Land! In the effort, you lost:
3 Skiffs
In their defense, Jarlaxle II lost:
11,682,828 Skiffs

I checked scores, and Alazar's net did indeed drop by the appropriate amount.

[Ruddertail]

Could this just be the defense having like 0 health?

[Shadow]

Could be, i never thought of that. Still seems really high does it not?

[Ruddertail]

Meh, I don't really know. I suppose for 0%, they're effectively defending with 0 troops, which is why you lose 3. As for losses, not sure how they're calculated.

I also had a similar result when I attacked him. The first time, he took massive losses, after that, he quickly went down to 0 troops...

Edit: Just espied him. 0% health.

[Shadow]

That explains it. Not smart. I had no idea losses were so drastic. And before anyone starts bashing me for taking advantage, his health was low because of a failed kill run on Marell. Maybe he will think twice next time?

[fingo]

Edit: Just espied him. 0% health.

Tut Tut not good. I didn't know health was related to losses. Thought it just made you easier to break the lower it was.

[Juska]

People bring this up every so often, yes health applies to losses, don't have 0%.

[Alazar is Back]

I had 0% health and shadow it was not a failed kill run on marrel for your information, if i wanted to kill him i could have very easily done it, me and marrel have been bickering for the last couple of rounds, but now we have split the difference and we are getting along. :P

[Peace Alliance]

whew... glad that one was explicable...

[Shadow]

well you attacked him probably close to 100 times at low land, so you payed with your army.

[Alazar is Back]

its all good.