One rat attacking violation

wolf bite · April 07, 2006, 04:44:06 PM

Just a note: I can?t just change things in the accounts without going into the code, which I don?t know too well and could take down the whole game if done wrong. I can not give turns. So the loss of a days turns has to be accounted for in reduced correction.

So my options are only being on their accounts to send away or destroy resources. I will disable when I see something wrong, but will not take turns to fix someone?s account to undisable them without their approval, this is why we are stuck.

I tend to agree that the only benefit Snare has received thus far is that his land was not taken. Snare should not have as much land as he has. I froze the account before he could take advantage of it. I have offered dropping 30K of his land to reactivate the account. Maybe 20K would be fairer now that he has lost a day of turns. But leaving it all there would not be fair to others. I need HIS approval.

Cloud is being reasonable to get this all moving. Now that I believe he only got 100 turns use of the land he should not have had, the area of correction suggested by The General and agreed in concept by Cloud.

Does this sound reasonable:
Snare drops 20K of land, no other corrections.
Cloud forfeits the value of 600 mil in food (Partly taken from his money to make it easier to do), and 20 mil loyalty.
I reactivate the accounts.

Oh, and I have no intent to destroy Cloud?s Leaders, even if received wrongly, this would set the account up for damage to others. So lets say leaving them with their leaders compensates for the lost turns.

Wolf Bite

Gen. Volkov · April 07, 2006, 05:39:54 PM

Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

cloud · April 07, 2006, 05:40:47 PM

dont make me lynch you volky.

Gen. Volkov · April 07, 2006, 05:43:41 PM

Bah. Your account is back isn't it?

cloud · April 07, 2006, 05:45:11 PM

aid me 75 turns then maybe we'll talk about your forgiveness.

Gen. Volkov · April 07, 2006, 05:47:03 PM

LOL. Right.

wolf bite · April 07, 2006, 06:13:53 PM

We did reach an agreement. I was on line as land was dropped, also I bought back a zombie, had aid sent to him, then killed it off again. This subject is dead as far as I go. Sure you guys can talk more about it, but I am done.

Wolf Bite
(Admin Duties)

artu · April 07, 2006, 07:13:24 PM

come on let them off the hook

Gorak · April 07, 2006, 09:51:43 PM

I'm new here

what the hell is a "1 rat attack"

wolf bite · April 07, 2006, 10:05:08 PM

1 rat attack strategy, invented by wolf bite and Holby, takes advantage of a penalty placed in RWL code for attacking someone 3 times your might by the attacker losing land. When we first ran the strategy, it was for fun to show it could be done, we did not start doing it every game, other people started to and locked up the games. Until we reprogram it to only do what it is intended to do, it is now considered a bug, abusing a bug is grounds for deletion of the account. Read more about it in the ?intentional maxing? topic in general discussion.

And it seems some people missed that I had put an offer on the table and both parties agreed, they have paid their fee and are again on good terms.

Wolf Bite