Development poll

Started by Shadow, March 21, 2011, 07:30:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

How many of you believe...

1a) that standard attack takes buildings?
1b) that standard attack does not take buildings?
2a) That secondary attack types like drive, sack, etc work if you use standard?
2b) That secondary attack types like drive, sack, etc do not work if you use standard?
3a) that "chaos" kills more of your opponent's troop than usual?
3b) that "chaos" kills less of your opponent's troops than usual?
Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

Gen. Volkov

#15
March 23, 2011, 03:20:40 AM
I told shael this the other night, but I think Chaos should kill more troops, not less. That's just what an attack with a name like that sounds like it should do. Kills more of your troops and the other guys troops, but takes less land. Standards should take buildings, makes it more interesting. Do not make standard compatible with sack, capture, etc. Doesn't make sense. Attacking with one type of troops is more sneak attackish, and thus the additional missions make sense. Standard attack is an all-out assault, so any sort of extra mission should be out of the question. Except maybe chaos. (Though that might make standard attacks over-powered for troop destruction.)
It is said that when Rincewind dies the occult ability of the entire human race will go up by a fraction. -Terry Pratchett

cloud says: I'm pretty sure I'm immune to everything that I can be immune to...brb snorting anthrax.

Sticker334 says(Peace Alliance): OMG! HOBOES

SiegeMaster

#16
March 23, 2011, 03:48:39 PM
i agree with Volkov
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions